Spin squeezing in Dicke-class of states with non-orthogonal spinors
Akhilesh K S1, Mallesh K S1, Sudha 2, 3, †, Hegde Praveen G1
Department of Physics, University of Mysore, Manasagangotri, Mysuru-570006, Karnataka, India
Department of Physics, Kuvempu University, Shankaraghatta, Shimoga-577 451, India
Inspire Institute Inc., Alexandria, Virginia 22303, USA

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: arss@rediffmail.com

Abstract

The celebrated Majorana representation is exploited to investigate spin squeezing in different classes of pure symmetric states of N qubits with two distinct spinors, namely the Dicke-class of states. On obtaining a general expression for spin squeezing parameter, the variation of squeezing for different configurations is studied in detail. It is shown that the states in the Dicke-class, characterized by two-distinct non-orthogonal spinors, exhibit squeezing.

1. Introduction

Spin, an intrinsic degree of freedom of the physical systems is a fascinating area of study as it is entirely of quantum origin not having a classical analogue. The components , , of the spin operator are non-commuting and hence obey the uncertainty relation

Based on the uncertainty relation satisfied by position, momentum operators, the concept of squeezing was first introduced for the states of harmonic oscillator and it was later extended to the radiation fields.[13] A comparison of the uncertainty relation satisfied by the components of spin operator with that of the non-commuting operators of bosonic systems led to the extension of the concept of squeezing to spin systems.[4] In the case of spin systems the lower bound which is essential for the study of squeezing needs a careful consideration because of its coordinate dependence. This led to the conclusion that the behaviour of squeezing is dependent on the choice of the coordinate frame. Kitegawa and Ueda[4] showed that the occurrence of squeezing in spin s state is due to the existence of quantum correlations among the constituent 2s spin 1/2 systems and suggested a coordinate independent definition of spin squeezing. According to Kitegawa-Ueda,[4] an N-qubit state is KU spin-squeezed if the minimum variance of a spin component normal to the mean spin direction is smaller than the standard quantum limit of the spin coherent state. Thus, for a spin squeezed state,
and hence the Kitegawa–Ueda spin squeezing parameter is defined as,
where ξ is a quantitative measure of spin squeezing and for a spin squeezed state .

Spin squeezing has been an intense area of study[426] due to its theoretical importance as well as the applicability of spin squeezed states in the fields of low noise, high precision spectroscopy[2729] and quantum information science.[10,11,1316] The relative ease with which spin squeezed states can be produced,[10,26] has made them more accessible and hence useful in the concerned fields.

In 1932, Ettore Majorana[30] had shown that a pure state with spin s = N/2 has one to one correspondence with the symmetrized combination of pure states of N-spin 1/2 systems (N-spinors) and provided an elegant geometrical representation of a symmetric multiqubit state as N points on the Bloch sphere. Based on the number of distinct spinors (diversity degree) and the frequency of their occurrence (degeneracy configuration), a useful classification of pure symmetric multiqubit states into SLOCC (stochastic local operations and classical communication) inequivalent families has been achieved.[31,32] Recently, permutation symmetric states have received a revived attention in diverse branches of physics due to their geometrical intuition and experimental importance.[13,14,33,34]

Dicke states , the common eigenstates of , belonging respectively to eigenvalues , , , are pure symmetric states consisting of two distinct orthogonal spinors , . The different degeneracy configurations exhaust all Dicke states and each degeneracy configuration corresponds to an SLOCC inequivalent class.[31] It is well known that Dicke states exhibit no spin-squeezing inspite of them being entangled states (In fact, spin-squeezing implies pairwise entanglement in multiqubit symmetric states but the converse is not always true). It would therefore be of interest to examine the spin squeezing nature of N qubit symmetric states consisting of all possible permutations of two distinct non-orthogonal spinors, the natural extension of Dicke states. The class of N-qubit pure symmetric states with two distinct spinors (diversity degree 2) are referred to as Dicke-class of states, with the Dicke states corresponding to symmetrized combination of two orthogonal spinors , . An analysis of spin squeezing in the Dicke-class of states with two distinct non-orthogonal spinors, taking into account all possible degeneracy configurations among them, is the aim of this work. In view of the connection between spin squeezing and pairwise entanglement in multiqubit states,[11,1316] this study will be quite useful in quantum information science.

This paper is organized as follows: The first section gives an introduction to the concept of spin squeezing and provides a brief overview of Majorana representation of pure symmetric multiqubit states. On defining the Dicke-class of states in Section 1, the structure of these states in their canonical form is given in Section 2. The mean spin vector of each SLOCC inequivalent family of Dicke-class of states is identified in Section 2. Among the spin components perpendicular to the mean spin vector, the one which gives minimum variance is identified in Section 3 for all degeneracy configurations of the Dicke-class of states. Using the results of Section 2 and Section 3, the spin squeezing parameter is explicitly given in Section 4. Illustrative graphs of spin squeezing parameter for several different degeneracy configurations (corresponding to different SLOCC classes) are given in Section 4, each of them indicating spin squeezing in Dicke-class of states with two distinct non-orthogonal spinors. The amount of spin squeezing in each SLOCC class, as a function of number of qubits is discussed in detail (Section 4). The concluding section (Section 5) summarizes the results of the paper and highlights their significance.

2. Canonical form of Dicke-class of states and identification of their mean spin vector

A pure symmetric state of N qubits consisting of two spinors, spinor appearing k times and spinor appearing Nk times, is given in the Majorana representation[30] by

Here P denotes all possible permutations of the two spinors and is the normalization factor. Without any loss of generality, one can employ a coordinate system in which z-axis is directed along one of the two qubits and x-z plane contains the other. On choosing , it readily follows that , being real. The canonical form of Dicke-class of states is thus equivalent to the state and we have
as the canonical form of Dicke-class of states. One can see that a = 0 leads to the spinor , which is orthogonal to . The Dicke states are thus given in Majorana representation by
The non-zero values of a in , i.e., leads to the Dicke-class of states with non-orthogonal spinors. When a = 1, we have which leads to the separable state (corresponding to k = N) and is not of interest as far as its quantum correlation features are considered.

In order to evaluate the spin squeezing parameter for the states , one needs to identify the mean spin direction and a direction perpendicular to which gives minimum variance of the spin operator , for all values of N and . It is worth recalling here that a unit vector along the mean spin direction of any multiqubit symmetric state is given by

where are the Pauli spin operators corresponding to k-th qubit. The expectation values of the spin operators are evaluated with respect to the state in Eq. (2), i.e., , .

In order to find out the mean spin direction , we need to evaluate the expectation values , and . As the spinor is associated with the unit vector along z axis and corresponds to unit vector in the xz plane, it is not difficult to see that the expectation value is zero. On explicit evaluation also, we have verified that for all degeneracy configurations. The expectation values , are explicitly evaluated for all possible values of k for each N from N = 2 to N = 5 and are listed in Tables 1 and 2 respectively.

Table 1.

for different degeneracy configurations.

.
Table 2.

for different degeneracy configurations.

.

On a careful observation of the expectation values listed in Tables 1, 2, a general expression for , applicable for all values of N and can be obtained, and they are given by

where N is the number of qubits and is the normalization constant given by

Since , the mean spin direction becomes,

A plane perpendicular to is defined by the two mutually orthogonal unit vectors given by
Any vector in the plane defined by unit vectors , , is perpendicular to and the task is to identify a unit vector, for example, , such that the spin component has the minimum variance.

3. Identification of the minimum variance

We recall here the definition of spin squeezing adopted in Ref. [4]. A pure symmetric state of N qubits is said to be squeezed in a direction perpendicular to the mean spin direction, iff the spin squeezing parameter ξ given by

lies between 0 and 1 ( ).

Here is the minimum uncertainty (variance) of spin angular momentum component in the plane perpendicular to the mean spin direction . As the vector lies in the plane defined by vectors , both of which are perpendicular to the mean spin direction , we denote . In view of the fact that ,

and minimizing is equivalent to minimizing the quadratic form where
It is not difficult to see that the minimum value of (equivalently ) is given by the minimum eigenvalue of the matrix T. Thus, one has
where and with , given in Eq. (9).

A straight forward calculation gives

leading to
Equation (12) provides an expression for the minimum variance of the spin component perpendicular to the mean spin direction . The relation in Eq. (12) also identifies as , the direction along which the component of the spin has minimum variance.

Table 3 lists the expressions for for all degeneracy configurations possible for N = 2 to N = 5.

Table 3.

for different degeneracy configurations.

.

In Table 3,

By careful analysis one can obtain a general expression for for N qubits as
The spin squeezing parameter (See Eq. (10)) now turns out to be
and can be readily evaluated for all values of N and . The variation of ξ with respect to the real parameter a ( ) is shown in Figs. 13, for different values of N and k.

Fig. 1. Variation of spin-squeezing parameter ξ of the state when N = 8 and N = 12, for different values of k.
Fig. 2. Comparitive plots indicating the variation of ξ with respect to k when N = 105. Squeezing is seen to be more pronounced when k = 52.
Fig. 3. Variation of spin-squeezing parameter ξ of the state and corresponding to N = 6, k = 1, N = 6, k = 3 respectively.

One can draw following conclusions about the spin squeezing nature of Dicke-class of states . Recall here that spin squeezing is maximum when and there is no spin squeezing when .

(i) For any N, the squeezing parameter for the states and match with each other. This means, interchanging with in (See Eq. (2)) does not affect the spin-squeezing property, both of them having the same spin squeezing parameter.

(ii) From Figs. 1 and 2, it is evident that for a fixed N, squeezing increases (ξ decreases) in the whole range with increase in k ( ). But as, and have same ξ, we need to consider values of k up to where for even N and for odd N. For instance, in Fig. 2, the graph for N = 105, k = 15 is equivalent to the graph for N = 105, k = 90. Also, when , are equally distributed, i.e., when , the squeezing is pronounced in the whole range of parameter a, as can be seen in the graph for N = 105, k = 52.

(iii) The Dicke states

corresponding to a = 0 are seen to be non-squeezed (See Fig. 3). In fact, Dicke states with even N and corresponding to equal distribution of , , the spin squeezing parameter is undefined (See Fig. 3) as the mean spin direction becomes a null vector. Such Dicke states are the ones with and m = 0. For all other Dicke states, with odd or even N, , the spin squeezing parameter ξ is greater than 1 as is illustrated explicitly in the graph for N = 6, k = 1 (Fig. 3) and indicated in Figs. 1 and 2.

One can readily conclude that Dicke-class of states , containing two distinct non-orthogonal spinors (with ) exhibit squeezing, the amount of squeezing varying with the degeneracy configuration .

4. Conclusion

Using the Majorana representation of pure symmetric multiqubit states with two distinct spinors, we have studied their spin squeezing properties. By explicit determination of the mean spin vector and minimum variance of the states under consideration, the Kitegawa–Ueda spin squeezing parameter[4] is determined. Through illustrative graphs of the variation of the spin squeezing parameter, it is shown that symmetric multiqubit states characterized by two distinct non-orthogonal spinors exhibit spin-squeezing. For a fixed number of qubits in the state, the squeezing is seen to be maximum if the two distinct spinors characterizing the state are equal in number. Due to the usefulness of spin squeezed states in high precision, low noise spectroscopy and in quantum information theory, the study presented here is of importance. We wish to mention here that spin squeezing parameter of the Dicke-class of states considered here are determined in an alternative manner in Ref. [35] using the two-qubit density matrices of the symmetric multiqubit state, the results matching with that presented here. The study of spin squeezing for the pure symmetric multiqubit states having diversity degree 3 is under progress.

Reference
[1] Kimble H J Walls D F 1987 J. Opt. Soc. B 4 1450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/JOSAB.4.001450
[2] Loudon R Knight P L 1987 J. Mod. Opt. 34 709 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09500348714550721
[3] Wodkiewicz K 1985 Phys. Rev. B 32 4750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.32.4750
[4] Kitegawa M Ueda M 1993 Phys. Rev. A 47 5138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.47.5138
[5] Wineland D J Bollinger J J Itano W M Heinzen D J 1994 Phys. Rev. A 50 67 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.50.67
[6] Agarwal G S Puri R R 1990 Phys. Rev. A 41 3782 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.41.3782
[7] Agarwal G S Puri R R 1994 Phys. Rev. A 49 4968 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.49.4968
[8] Puri R R 1997 Pramana 48 787 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02845612
[9] Mallesh K S Swarnamala Sirsi Sbaih M A A Deepak P N Ramachandran G 2000 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 33 779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/33/4/310
[10] Sorenson A Duan L M Cirac J I Zoller P 2001 Nature 409 63 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35051038
[11] Ulam-Orgikh D Kitagawa M 2001 Phys. Rev. A 64 052106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.64.052106
[12] Usha Devi A R Mallesh K S Sbaih M A A Nalini K B Ramachandran G 2003 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 5333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/36/19/310
[13] Usha Devi A R Wang X Sanders B C 2003 Quantum Inf. Proc. 2 209 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QINP.0000004125.12489.f4
[14] Usha Devi A R Sudha 2011 Asian Journal of Physics 20 131
[15] Wang X Sanders B C 2003 Phys. Rev. A 68 03382 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.68.012101
[16] Wang X Molmer K 2002 Eur. Phys. J. D 18 385 http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjd/e20020045
[17] Usha Devi A R Uma M S Prabhu R Sudha 2006 Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 20 1917 http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217979206034406
[18] Usha Devi A R Uma M S Prabhu R Sudha 2005 J. Opt. B: Quantum Semiclass Opt. 7 S740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1464-4266/7/12/042
[19] Yan D Wang X G Song L J Zong Z G 2007 Cent. Eur. J. Phys. 5 367 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/s11534-007-0029-2
[20] Usha Devi A R Uma M S Prabhu R Rajagopal A K 2007 Phys. Lett. A 364 203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2006.11.073
[21] Toth G Knapp C Guhne O Briegel H J 2009 Phys. Rev. A 79 042334 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.79.042334
[22] Ma J Wang X Sun C P Nori F 2011 Phys. Rep. 509 89 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2011.08.003
[23] Vitagliano G Hyllus P Egusquiza I L Tóth G 2011 Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 240502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.240502
[24] Song-song Li 2011 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 50 719 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10773-010-0601-1
[25] Divyamani B G Sudha Usha Devi A R 2016 Int. J. Theor. Phys. 55 2324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10773-015-2870-1
[26] Wanlu Song Wanli Yang An Junhong Mang Feng 2017 Opt. Express 25 19226 http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.019226
[27] Caves C M 1981 Phys. Rev. D 23 1693 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.23.1693
[28] Yurke B 1986 Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 1515 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.1515
[29] Kitegawa M Ueda M 1991 Phys. Rev. Lett. 67 1852 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.1852
[30] Majorana E 1932 Nuovo Cimento 9 43 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02960953
[31] Bastin T Krins S Mathonet P Godefroid M Lamata L Solano 2009 E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 070503 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.070503
[32] Usha Devi A R Sudha A Rajgopal A K 2012 Quantum Inf. Proc. 11 685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11128-011-0280-8
[33] Sackett C A 2000 Nature 404 256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/35005011
[34] Usha Devi A R Prabhu R Rajagopal A K 2007 Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 060501 http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.060501
[35] Akhilesh K S Divyamani B G Sudha A Usha Devi A R Mallesh K S 2019 Quantum. Inf. Proc. 18 144 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11128-019-2244-3